Many trillions of dollars have been invested by the United States in the financial industry during the last 15 months. And the pace of the bailout continues to increase. A lot of real money has been put into the economy. But it seems to have disappeared.
Except for maintaining the lifestyles of upper management, the financial industry has not done what it is supposed to do with their economic stimulus monies. It has hoarded all of that money. And why not? When prices for everything is falling, stagnating cash is a good investment. But moving money is what drives the financial industry. Rest assured that those managers are brow-beating the few employees they have not yet laid off to find a place to invest the real money given to them by the treasury and Congress.
Now a trend spearheaded by US stock markets is forming in stock markets around the world. The values of stock markets in the Untied States are experiencing the most spectacular rises in their history. That would be an inviting investment, at least in the short term, for the big bailed out financial industry.
Imagine all of those trillions of dollars of bailout and stimulus money suddenly being invested in stock markets again. The value of US markets alone would rise at least several trillion dollars. Financial institutions are leading the charge. There is no other place, except T-bills…, for them to invest their bailout money. Could this rise in stock market values simply be another bubble?
Unlike the previous bubble, this rush for stocks is backed by the US Treasury’s bailout funds. The previous economic bubble, spanning several industries, has been funded by what is known as ‘leveraged’ investments. That basically means the borrowed money is invested in hopes of making that money back and then some more. Often money has been borrowed from a source that borrowed money from a source that borrowed money from a source… you get the idea. The financial industry is at the top of that pyramid. They can invest at least 9 dollars for every dollar deposited, or invested…, in their institution. Many, such as Lehman Bros., have leveraged their investment by more than 100 to 1! Now these financial institutions have real government money to invest. Now they won’t need to sell to satisfy a calling creditor.
The market’s current inflation is due to the mutual investment of the Treasury’s cash by financial institutions in each-other. But that money will do the rest of the economy little good. Manufacturers don’t have customers. So they won’t get loans. Higher stock prices in times like these only help companies that are willing to sell their own stocks for capital. And that does not help their stock’s price. The only stable increase in stock prices will be with financial companies that are investing in each-other.
Those of us who cannot afford to take advantage of this new bubble must be content to cheer on the financial superstars that can until this bubble pops too. The government is going to be compelled to do it to satisfy fearful politicians. Growing resentment combined with unemployment and a poor shopping experience is stirring up the voters. Eventually the government is going to take back the bailout and stimulus money. If that happens before the rest of the economy grows enough to support big financial companies again, then the bubble pops.
(Imagine the insider trading knowledge that federal politicians can peddle in that situation. They are going to make a killing!)
Posted in bailout, economy, government, markets, politics
Tagged bailout, corruption, economy, financial bubble, insider trading, investment opportunity, politics, prediction, stimulus, stock market
A revolutionary change is needed to fix our broken democracy. But don’t expect either of the two major political parties to provide that change. The Republicans really protect the rich and powerful’s freedom to dominate everyone else. (They are probably fans of the Marquis de Sade). Their record while they had control of our government here in the United States has demonstrated that. Yet the Democrats seem to have forgotten what inspired that so called Republican Revolution.
Can you remember why Newt Gingrich was able to rally the nation behind the Republican Party? The answer is that people were tired of the secret deal making and favortism of the Democratic Party’s ‘good-ol-boy’ network. Their way of spending federal money has been based on a racket administered by senior lawmakers. Democrats have rewarded junior lawmakers for passing special interest legislation that benefits senior lawmaker’s campaign contributors. In return for their cooperation, junior lawmakers would be given ‘pork’. That ‘pork’ is essentially a bribe disguised as funding for local projects and public services. The Republican Revolution’s ‘Contract With America’ has promised to stop that kind of corruption.
Unfortunately the Republicans are at least as intoxicated by power as the Democrats. During the time they controlled our government, they have created a ‘Pay to Play’ system for lobbyists. That system allowed powerful special interests a way to bypass the formal leadership structure of Congress and go directly to the Republican’s rank and file members of Congress. (This system became known in the media as ‘K-Street’, for the name of the street where the most influential lobbyists kept their offices.) Rather than reducing corrupting influences over Congress, the Republican Pary hid under the bedsheets with them.
Now, instead of a revolution, the wheel of progress has rolled backwards. This is not referring to the election of Barack Obama. This is about Congress. The Democrats have taken back their control. And they are on a mission to save America’s economy. But like the Republican Party’s use of the ‘War On Terror’ as an excuse to help the clients of influencial lobbyists hoard wealth, the Democrats are using the resulting financial crisis as an excuse to create a pork barrel bonanza.
The very smug faces on leading Senate Democrats during passage of the most recent bailout package are suspicious. Those are the looks of people enjoying a feast; they are not sacrificing. And they know that despite America’s overwhelming disgust with Congress, voters usually support their local representatives. So, they will probably not be held accountable for their contribution to this financial fiasco. President Barack Obama will probably take the blame for Congressional dysfunction. And then Congress is going to welcome back a member of their inner circle.
If history is an indicator of what the future will bring, then we cannot depend on either of the two dominant political parties to correct the way our nation’s government is changing. The Great Depression and more recent economic downturns demonstrat that both Democrats and Republicans allow greedy market manipulators to undermine our economy. And we know that both Republicans and Democrats eagerly use government to create for themselves influence pedeling rackets. The Democratic and Republican Parties have a proven recornd of corruption.
We, that is us individual voters, don’t need to wonder about who the Republican Party or the Democratic Party really represent. It is obvious that both Political Parties represent very elite groups of very wealthy people. And those groups have more wealth invested in this rut we are in to leave it behind. Only a fool believes that wealthy people represent the best interests of regular Americans. They care about their wealth. For a full revolution of the wheel of progress, the dominant political parties need to be replaced.
Replace them by voting only for candidates from established political parties that are not one of the two dominant parties. Do this for each election. After only six years, there won’t be a Republican or Democrat left in office. And after only four years, a new decentralized political establishent will begin to run our country as our founders intended.
Oh… Please bless America again.
Posted in bailout, Culture, economy, government, markets, politics, Problem, Solution
Tagged bailout, Barack Obama, Change, Congress, democrats, economy, Political Parties, politics, reform, republicans, Revolution
Aren’t the bailouts of industries by the US government a form of subsidies? I thought those were supposed to be phased out according to international trade agreements. Doesn’t the World Trade Organization, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and similar trade agreements with the United States threaten sanctions against member countries that introduce new subsidies to protect domestic industries?
The bailouts of the American auto industry and the American financial industry obviously help American businesses compete agianst foriegn businesses. What will prevent those treaty members from suing for damages or sanctions as a result of the market warping subsidies given by the US government to American businesses?
It may seem to be a contradiction to describe something as free when it is bound by rules. That is the case with free markets. They exist only when specific rules are obeyed. The banning of anti-competitive behavior exemplifies those rules. When those rules are broken a free market becomes something else.
When left to their own devices, free markets self destruct. To understand why, focus your attention on how resources are redistributed in free markets. Then a way to save free markets from themselves can be conceived.
Successful free market participants are rewarded with more resources than their competitors for their efforts. (A buyer gets something that another buyer can not afford to buy. And a seller makes a sale instead of another seller.) The most successful competitors get extra resources. Ideally these extra resources are used to increase supplies of whatever they offer. This is supposed to happen until the price of these supplies become too low for less efficient competitors to stay in business. This can conceivably lead to a monopoly.
That situation would be ideal if it does not afford the winner an opportunity to change the market’s rules and artificially inflate their advantage. A monopoly’s, (or cartel’s), influence over the market’s rules is proportional to their share of the market. The rules inevitably are changed to favor established sellers and become anti-competitive. That violates free market rules. A manipulated market is not free.
Free markets are worth preserving. They bring as many sellers together with as many consumers as practicably possible. Free markets most dependably give consumers what they demand until rules that protect established sellers happens. Then the free market is subverted and becomes something else. Rules defining free markets also need to help preserve them.
It is too bad that what makes free markets so desirable also gives successful participants an incentive to become domineering. An equally impartial dis-incentive is needed for balance. It is obvious that this dis-incentive needs to punish participants that begin to dominate a free market.
A free market rule that imposes a progressive tax on the value of market share can provide a plain and impartial method to preserve the market’s competition and innovation. It can also provide an equitable source of government funding. The tax could be scaled so that it diminishes the incentive of established market participants to gain market share until they have around 33% of market share. Then that incentive can be completely canceled out.
The target of 33% can be optimized to maximize tax revenue. Potential revenue for this kind of tax is only limited by the health and growth of the market. That gives regulators a strong incentive to do what is really best for the market.
The reason why the economy is collapsing is because too many average consumers have lost their purchasing power. From the beginning of the crisis this has been obvious. So why are policymakers concentrating on implementing a trickle-down approach to rescuing the economy?
They have put their faith in the directors of big businesses to save our economy. Almost all of the cash meant to rescue the economy, (last count = more than 2.7 trillion), has been given to them. This is despite the widespread belief that free markets most efficiently direct investments to where they would be most useful. Our leaders need to remember why free markets work well.
Free markets democratize the economy. They give consumers the power to direct the economy. Consumers do this with their purchasing power. They give money to sellers and investors who offer the best deals for the things consumers want. In a free market anyone can hope to become a self-made business magnate. And the customers get to choose them. Free market economies serve the will of the people.
Our free market economy is quickly disappearing. The people have lost their purchasing power and Congress has abandoned them. Money for saving the economy has been given to the leaders of big businesses. They are not investing that money in people who would compete against them. The directors of big businesses are using their purchasing power to help themselves. Regular consumers are left to fend for themselves.
Congress’s mistake must be corrected soon. The bailout money is being hoarded by big businesses that are laying off employees. More consumers are losing their purchasing power. If centralized control over the economy remains for the long term, then innovation would probably be stifled by timid bureaucrats and big business leaders eager to protect their profit margins. The situation is getting worse.
Policymakers and Congress can easily correct this situation. Simply direct the bailout money to average consumers. Let them choose which businesses deserve a bailout. Chances are almost everyone will get what they want.
Posted in bailout, economy, government, markets, policy, Principle Ideas, Problem, Solution
Tagged bailout, big business, Congress, consumers, economy, free market, Solution